Income Annuities, Cost of Living Adjustments, and Inflation Protection

Written by Hersh Stern Updated Tuesday, January 16, 2018

cola annuity

I'm often asked by customers whether they should buy additional inflation protection to guarantee the purchasing power of their annuities. Most of us have heard about Cost of Living Adjustments (so-called "COLAs") that can be added to an income annuity contract.

If you're wondering whether such a COLA rider is worth the cost, the answer may be yes, but only in specific situations. Most income annuity buyers would likely not benefit from buying a COLA. I'll tell you why, but first, let's review how a typical COLA rider works.

An introduction to COLAs

The term COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) is used by insurance companies to refer to one of two types of annual increases in the monthly payment--

Calculate My FREE Annuity Quote Now!



  • Optional: For a 2-person annuity (joint lives)

No agent will call you

Your privacy is guaranteed.
Find advanced calculator options here.

(a) A "level" percent increase. This is when the COLA percentage does not change for the duration of your contract. The most commonly selected percentage is a 3% per year adjustment, but you can select another rate of increase. Most companies permit level increases from 1% to 6% per year, though one carrier even permits 10% a year.

Most insurance companies increase your income on a COMPOUNDING basis. This means each year's monthly income level is increased by the fixed annual percentage, and this new higher number becomes the base for next year’s increase, and so on for each year of your contract.

A few companies offer you a choice of SIMPLE vs. COMPOUND increases. The simple increase method uses your first year's starting income level to determine each subsequent yearly increase. Your income always increases faster under the COMPOUNDING than under the SIMPLE method.

(b) A few companies also offer a true Bureau of Labor Statistics (‘BLS’) derived Consumer Price Index ('CPI') adjustment. This percentage is recalculated January 1st of each year. Your income can either increase or decrease for that year based on the government's reported change in the CPI index.

With the first kind of COLA increase, the “level” type, you at least know you will receive the rate of increase you paid for regardless of the percent change declared by the BLS. That is not true for a CPI based COLA. With that type your income is dependent on the government's calculation of the rate of inflation. A figure you may disagree with.

On the other hand, a CPI-based increase gives you unlimited upside adjustments if we encounter a hyper-inflationary period down the road, and that’s a very big “if”.

For your information, the average CPI increase reported by the BLS during the past 60 years is around 3.00%. This includes the hyper-inflation period of the late 1970's. You also need to know that with a CPI-indexed annuity your monthly income amount can decrease in years when the CPI goes negative. With a fixed level percent it always goes up, year after year.

One additional point about CPI-based COLAs

Many people believe the government systematically under reports the true rate of inflation in our economy. Besides the political incentives for having the public think inflation is "under control," the CPI has a salient impact on the costs of operating the government since all Social Security payments and Federal employee salaries (including the military) are pegged to this same CPI number.

Testimonial Image
Just bought my first SMA and was very happy to have gone through Immediate Annuities.com. I found them in an article in the Wall Street Journal. As a first time buyer, I had a lot of questions. But to their credit, they did a great job answering my questions directly or getting the right answers from the right people when they needed to.
Allen Boaman
Read 200+ verified reviews

So if you bought a CPI-indexed annuity, your monthly payments would not necessarily keep up with "true" inflation. In fact, most of my clients who bought inflation protection opted for the level type simply because they did not want to rely on the government’s calculation to determine their annual percent increase.

COLAs reduce your payments in the earlier years

Regardless of which type of inflation protection you consider, your first year's monthly income is always reduced from what you otherwise would receive without the COLA/CPI. This happens because the insurance company must "make up" the difference between the potential income increases you receive in later years against the fixed amount of your initial premium. In other words, the COLA/CPI IS NOT A FREE BENEFIT. You are paying UP FRONT for increased income in the later years by giving up income in the earlier years.

So, you’re probably wondering whether it’s worth giving up income in the earlier years to receive more income in the later years. To answer this question objectively you'll need to consider it from an actuary's point of view.

An Actuary's opinion on COLAs

In general, it takes an amount of time equal to half the number of years remaining in your life expectancy, for the monthly income level of an annuity with a COLA to reach the monthly income level of the same annuity without a COLA.

Think about this: Assume your life expectancy is twenty years and you selected a single life annuity. It would take ten years (half of your remaining life expectancy) for the annuity with the COLA rider to reach the monthly income level of that same annuity without a COLA option. Even after ten years, it takes the annuity with the COLA option another ten years (the remaining number of years in your original life expectancy when you bought the annuity) to make you whole with the same total dollar amount you would have received from the annuity without the COLA option.

More on the economics of COLAs

So the real question is, if adding a COLA rider makes sense to you emotionally, but it doesn't make economic sense, should you add a COLA to your annuity? Perhaps only if you are very very sure you’ll live past the life expectancy estimate an actuary calculates you’ll live. That’s because you will not break-even on the cost of the COLA rider until you at minimum reach your normal life expectancy.

Now if you selected a non-refund annuity (one that does not make any guarantees to a beneficiary), it's also possible that you may pass away before you reach that breakeven point. Remember, you must live AT LEAST as long as your normal life expectancy to just breakeven with a COLA rider. Otherwise buying a COLA does not make actuarial sense.

Do-it-yourself annuity inflation protection

Only a small number of my clients add a COLA to their annuities. They're the ones who believe they have longevity genes or that we're on the threshold of a long period of hyperinflation.

What do my other clients do about protecting their purchasing power? Some of them set aside money in inflation-linked assets. Think gold, silver, oil, or other natural resources stocks or funds. If there is a runaway inflation, those assets should increase in value much faster than the actual rate of inflation.

Theoretically, they will be able to buy much more annuity income with their fully-grown side funds when interest rates are also a lot higher than today. Plus, they’ll be many years older, which will further enhance the amount of monthly income they can buy at that time.

A COLA reality-check

Trouble is that anyone who followed the inflation protection approach I describe above has been sorely disappointed the past twenty years since interest rates continue to drop.

Also, any consumer who added a CPI-based COLA rider to their annuity in the last twenty years probably overpaid for that protection. Those riders were priced by the insurance companies to cover the risks of a much higher rate of inflation than actually occurred.

The bottom line is that the question of whether or not you should add a COLA to your annuity is very difficult to finesse. Even the experts have been wrong all along about the direction of interest rates and inflation.

More Coverage: US Bureau of Labor Statistics

We'd love to hear from you!

Please post your comment or question. It's completely safe – we never publish your email address.

Add a new comment:(Allowed tags: <b><i><br>)


Comments (6)

  1. Steven:
    Mar 13, 2015 at 03:57 PM

    Does an immediate annuity with a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) satisfy RMD requirements?

  2. Hersh Stern:
    Mar 13, 2015 at 03:58 PM

    Hi Steven-

    In general, when you invest IRA or 401k monies into an immediate annuity, those monies are considered to have satisfied RMDs. I discuss this in great detail here:

    https://www.immediateannuities.com/required-minimum-distribution/

    Your particular situation, an immediate annuity that is issued with a COLA rider, falls under the rules described in
    Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004-26, T.D. 9130, Required Distributions From Retirement Plans.

    Question 14 in the bulletin asks “Are annuity payments permitted to increase?”

    The answer is that for an annuity to be increasing and satisfy RMD rules the expected return over your lifetime must be greater than the premium paid for the annuity. That’s usually true for the typical life annuity. The IRS offers several examples for this rule, one of which, example 5, I believe is similar to your situation.

    I strongly suggest you consult a CPA about RMDs before you decide to buy an IRA annuity with a COLA rider.

    If you have any other questions about annuities, give me a call. I know they can get complicated.

    Hersh

  3. Carl:
    Jun 08, 2015 at 01:45 PM

    I am 65, my wife 64---If I understand correctly, an immediate annuity providing for joint lifetime payments for my wife and I with a guaranteed minimum of 20 years AND either inflation adjusted or increasing by 3% a year (a common industry standard) would escape the RMD requirements? Am I right? If so, the inflation adjustment feature and the 20 year certain requirements allow far less distribution than the table would suggest.

  4. Hersh Stern:
    Jun 08, 2015 at 02:17 PM

    Hi Carl-

    When you transfer money from your pre-tax account to buy an immediate annuity the IRS considers the annuity to have satisfied future RMDs (with respect only to the premium transferred into the annuity).

    This holds regardless of whether you buy a single life or a joint life annuity, or one with or without a cost of living adjustment (“COLA”), or one with a period certain or one without, SO LONG AS the period is not greater than your life expectancy “multiple” on the RMD table. In your case, if you were to buy the annuity today, a 20 year certain guarantee for a 65 man, 64 woman is well within the guidelines. Even at age 70-1/2 a 20 year certain feature is still within the life expectancy range.

    You also correctly observed that by adding the 3% COLA rider you significantly reduce the annual income level in the earlier years to a level BELOW the RMD requirement. On its face you might think that would be a violation of the RMD. Nonetheless, this is permitted because in the later years your monthly withdrawals are fully expected to balloon (due to the compounding effect of the COLA) and so on balance the IRS recognizes that you’ve set in motion a distribution scheme which addresses the spirit of the RMD rules.

    You can read more about RMDs here:

    https://www.immediateannuities.com/required-minimum-distribution/

    Hersh

  5. Jessica:
    Apr 18, 2016 at 03:48 PM

    I noticed on your calculator that if I add a COLA rider of say 3% I get a "lower" monthly income than without a COLA. Why?

  6. Hersh Stern:
    Apr 18, 2016 at 03:49 PM

    Hi Jessica-

    Since you would be paying to the insurance company the same premium or investment amount (e.g., $100,000) for the annuity with a 3% COLA as you would for an annuity without a COLA, the only way the company can show annual increases is by reducing your monthly payments in the earlier years. In other words, when someone buys an annuity with a COLA they are not necessarily receiving more total income over their normal life expectancy than they would have received from an annuity without a COLA provision. It’s just that the COLA annuity's payments are distributed differently, starting with much lower payments in the earlier years and increased payments in the later years.

    Hersh