How To Turn Your Retirement Nest Egg Into Income
This article appears at the following website: forbes.com
We spend most of our working lives putting money into our retirement accounts (hopefully), but what happens when we retire? How do we turn that nest egg into income that will last at least as long as we do? Let’s take a look at some options:
Live off interest and dividends
The most conservative option would be to live off your interest and dividend income. The advantage of this approach is that you have no chance of running out of money since you never touch your principal. If you stick to TIPS (treasury inflation protected securities), you also don’t have to worry about your income being reduced or eroded by inflation.)
However, your income wouldn’t be very high. 30-yr TIPS are only currently paying about 1%. (Unlike most other bonds, the value their interest is paid on is adjusted with inflation.) The current yield on the S&P 500 is about 1.9%, but it comes with more volatility and the risk of dividend cuts.
You could increase your dividend income by choosing stocks that pay higher dividends. For example, online brokerage firm Motif Investing offers a “motif” or basket of 20 stocks with “High Yield Dividends” yielding about 5% that haven’t cut their dividends in the last 10 years and another one of “Dividend Stars” yielding almost 4% that haven’t cut their dividends in the last 25 years. You could be taking more risk with fewer stocks though.
Purchase an immediate annuity
Another option is to use part of your savings to purchase an immediate income annuity (not to be confused with a deferred annuity) that pays an income to you and possibly to your survivor as long as one of you is alive. On immediateannuities.com, a 65-yr old couple living in CA could purchase an immediate annuity for $500,000 that would pay them $2,363 a month (or about 5.7%) for as long as they live. Think of it like buying yourself a traditional pension.
There are several downsides though. First of all, the income isn’t adjusted for inflation and annuities that are inflation-adjusted pay a lot less. Second, you typically lose access to your principal and the ability to benefit from investment growth or to pass anything on to heirs. (This is why you want to keep some savings aside.) Finally, there’s the risk that the insurance company won’t be able to pay the annuity, although insurance companies are generally re-insured and you can minimize this risk by purchasing from more than one high-rated insurance companies.
Take withdrawals each year
The most common strategy is known as the 4% rule. It was developed by a financial planner named Bill Bengen after he discovered that a portfolio of 50% stocks and 50% bonds could survive a withdrawal of 4% of the initial portfolio value and increased annually by inflation for every 30-year period starting in 1926. (You’d withdraw 4% of a million dollar portfolio or $40k and increase the withdrawals with inflation each year regardless of what the actual portfolio’s value is.)
Just bought my first SMA and was very happy to have gone through Immediate Annuities.com. I found them in an article in the Wall Street Journal. As a first time buyer, I had a lot of questions. But to their credit, they did a great job answering my questions directly or getting the right answers from the right people when they needed to.
Many financial planners use this as a starting point since it offers higher income than just taking interest and dividends from a similarly diversified portfolio, has less risk than sticking to just a handful of high-dividend paying stocks, and avoids the problems with immediate annuities. There have also been a number of variations developed that use a more flexible withdrawal system to reduce risk or increase income in the early years or claim to have a higher “safe withdrawal rate” with a different investment strategy. (One timing strategy based on a concept called “dual momentum” even claims a 0% risk of drawing down your portfolio to 50% or less of the initial value after 2500 Monte Carlo simulations of 30 year time periods.)
There are downsides with this approach too. First, it assumes that you only need income for 30 years and that you need to withdraw a fixed amount of income (rising with inflation), ignoring the possibility that you may need to withdraw more until debts like your mortgage are paid off or until you collect a pension or Social Security benefits. (A free tool called FIREcalc allows you to run your own historical simulations using your choice of time frame, withdrawal needs, and even asset allocation.) Second, the original 4% rule, the variations, and the FIREcalc tool are all based on historical returns that may be very different from the future. In particular, many investment experts are predicting below average returns for both stocks and bonds over at least the next 7-10 years based on high stock valuations and low interest rates.
The best retirement income strategy for you depends on your retirement time horizon, your income needs, and the risks you’re willing to take. In any case, you might want to consult with an unbiased and qualified financial planner to discuss your options. (Your employer may even offer access to one through a workplace financial wellness program.) Otherwise, if you pick the wrong approach, it may be way too late once you’ve discovered you’ve made a mistake.