Making Sure Retirement Savings Don’t Run Out
This article appears at the following website: nytimes.com
We are living longer, but the life expectancy of our money may have trouble keeping pace.
The combination of longer retirements and more exaggerated cycles in financial markets heightens what financial advisers call longevity risk, the possibility of running out of money before running out of time. But adjustments can be made to investment portfolios, financial plans and lifestyles — before and after retirement — to limit the risk, they say, without increasing other risks.
“People are living longer and looking with a more critical eye at their retirement and whether they’ll have enough funds,” said Leo Kelly III, chief executive of Kelly Wealth Management in Hunt Valley, Md. An affirmative answer “comes down to two things: investing intelligently and allocating assets correctly.”
Get quick answers to your annuity questions: Call 800-872-6684 (9-5 EST)
One investment vehicle, an income annuity — which in exchange for an initial lump sum typically pays a fixed monthly amount, no matter how long the holder lives — is good to counter longevity risk. But opinion toward such annuities is mixed. Some advisers, including Mr. Kelly, consider them too expensive and complicated to be useful for many retirees.
“The returns are not attractive because part of what you get is a return of capital” from your upfront payment, “not just interest, and if you die early you lose out,” he said. “If you want to bet that you’re going to live longer than your life expectancy, O.K., but I still wouldn’t do it.”
Harold Evensky, president of Evensky & Katz Wealth Management in Miami, says he once disliked annuities, but his thinking changed. The traditional sellers of annuities, life insurance companies, have been joined in the marketplace by companies like the fund manager Vanguard that he said offer simpler, more transparently priced products. As for the bugs Mr. Kelly cited, Mr. Evensky sees them more as features.
“You get a bigger bang for the buck because payments are partly a return of capital and because some people leave money on the table” by dying early, he said. “If you die early, you made a bad deal,” he acknowledged. “But you’re dead, so you don’t care. Annuities are a powerful tool for managing cash flow.”
Consumers needn’t wait until retirement to pick up that tool. Anyone contemplating an annuity should consider buying it early, advisers say. The sooner an investor puts up the lump sum, the cheaper a certain fixed payment later will be.
A 55-year-old man buying an annuity would need to put down only $50,000 to collect $625 each month starting at 70, while a 70-year-old man would need $100,000 to buy immediate monthly payments of the same amount, according to the website immediateannuities.com.
It may be possible for the 55-year-old to come out ahead by keeping his $50,000 for 15 years, investing it and buying an annuity at 70, Mr. Evensky said. But, he added, the point of an annuity is to produce guaranteed income, so for someone who wants that, why not guarantee the amount sooner? Another reason to buy a deferred annuity, as it is called, is psychological.
“There is a great reluctance for most investors to purchase an immediate annuity,” he said. “The relatively small investment required at, say, 55 seems to offer a significant benefit so it is a more palatable purchase.”
Whether advisers like or dislike annuities, they agree that being able to rely on annuity income allows working and retired people to take more risks with their other assets, say, by owning more stocks to try to capture growth and not just income. That used to be discouraged for retirees in case the market plunged just when they needed their money.
“If you have a longtime horizon, more than 15 to 20 years, you should be exposed to the stock market,” said Joyce L. Franklin, head of JLFranklin Wealth Planning in Larkspur, Calif. She cautioned, though, that “clients in retirement should have at least six to 24 months of cash at hand.”
Like Mr. Kelly, Ms. Franklin is not a fan of annuities. She suggests that retirees who want an annuity and are in good health should wait as long as possible, at least until well into their 70s, before drawing income from one.
Just bought my first SMA and was very happy to have gone through Immediate Annuities.com. I found them in an article in the Wall Street Journal. As a first time buyer, I had a lot of questions. But to their credit, they did a great job answering my questions directly or getting the right answers from the right people when they needed to.
The same goes for the annuity that nearly every retiring American qualifies for: Social Security. For those for whom 66 is full retirement age, for example, the monthly benefit increases by 8 percent for every year that a recipient delays claiming it, until age 70. It is worth the wait, in Ms. Franklin’s opinion.
“For healthier people, it definitely makes sense to wait until 70 to claim your benefits,” she said.
David A. Littell, director of the Retirement Income Program at The American College of Financial Services, noted that the addition to the monthly benefit that came from claiming later was more than it should be based on average life expectancy, especially for women.
“There’s tremendous value to deferring until 70,” he said. “Social Security is the best-priced annuity you’re going to buy.”
Deferring benefits is such a good deal, he added, that retirees generally come out ahead if they make ends meet by spending more of their 401(k) assets instead of claiming Social Security at the normal age. But other steps can be taken to avoid doing that.
Ms. Franklin encourages savers to open a Roth individual retirement account or convert a traditional IRA into a Roth, something that they can do long before retiring. Roth withdrawals are tax-free because contributions are made with dollars that have been taxed already. When the time comes, retirees can dip into Roth assets while they wait to claim Social Security or take money out of taxable private plans, she said.
Another option is to keep working, full or part time, past your expected retirement date. That greatly reduces longevity risk in two ways, advisers say. It covers at least part of living expenses for those years, and it allows returns to continue to accrue in your nest egg.
“The impact of extending your income and deferring the need to go into your assets for several years is extraordinary,” Mr. Kelly said.
Staying on the job longer has another benefit, he suggested.
By working past retirement age, “people also tend to feel more fulfilled,” he said. “We’re living longer, better and healthier, and we’re going to continue to be more active. It’s not about how long you live, but how well you live long.”